Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Looking for Ms. Locklear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus as to whether it should be kept or redirected, but that can be handled editorially since no one is arguing for deletion. Star Mississippi 14:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for Ms. Locklear

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Zero sourcing found. Involvement of Rhett & Link does not transfer notability from them. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Am surprised that the nominator found zero sourcing given a Google search for the film title in speech marks found this on page 5 and I also found another source available on newspapers.com. A third source was also found on the Rhett & Link page however it appears to be self-published. NemesisAT (talk) 23:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Those both seem to be routine coverages of the film being screened at local festivals. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rhett_&_Link#Film_and_television. I wasn't aware that the GMM guys had put out a documentary, so I may have to watch this. That side, I can't really find that much about this film. I can see where it's screened in some places over the years but not in any major enough fashion to pass that element of NFILM. There is only the one RT review, but it and a tiny bit of coverage aren't really enough to make it independently notable from its creators. This is relatively well covered in the main article in the film and television section, so I'd say that this should redirect there. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.