Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogicalDOC SW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as moot, article has been speedily deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion by User:Fastily. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LogicalDOC SW

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable software product. The subject went through AfD earlier this year and was deleted. This time some more pretense of references has been added, but I don't think any of it constitutes significant coverage in reliable sources. Author is single-purpose (see histories of LogicalDOC, LogicalDOC sw, LogicalDOC software). Haakon (talk) 07:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that LogicalDOC is notable

Hi Haakon, i respect your opinion, but i can tell you some things about this issue:

I wrote on Wikipedia about LogicalDOC in the past because it is a project widely used and well known in the domain of document management. I am not an experienced writer, but if always wikipedia deletes my articles how can i manage to become a good writer and write on other topics?

Before writing about LogicalDOC i saw the pages of Alfresco, Knowledgetree, OpenKM etc. I think that the LogicalDOC article is very similar in the approach, and it is not a promotion, just a description of a software. If you says that my article is a promotion, than all these other are promotions and should be delete, but currently they aren't marked for deletion.

I ask myself why all other projects like this can be known and LogicalDOC not, i cannot understand.

As notability, what i have to done more? 1- I reported a set of articles from various sources (TheServerSide, CMS Wire...) 2- If you search for 'document management open source' or 'open source dms' in Google, LogicalDOC is in second page!

Please remove the deletion marks, and tell me if i have to do something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sprmw7 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and salt this and all the variants: a re-creation of deleted material that doesn't really address the issues that led to this article's deletion before. The "references" seem to be discussion boards. This is also unambiguous advertising from top to bottom:

the software is designed for business professionals to easily install and use without help from IT....
LogicalDOC’s features — including workflow, electronic signatures and version control — are designed to help organizations manage the document lifecycle, promote collaboration and ensure compliance....
In the next year, LogicalDOC started to be recognized by the Community as one of the easiest and lightweight enterprise document management system....

-Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged for speedy deletion. I have also protected the pages LogicalDOC, LogicalDOC sw, LogicalDOC (software) and LogicalDOC software against re-creation, and would recommend doing the same with this. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.