Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Local 58

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Local 58

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NWEB. (Prod was endorsed by creator, but removed by another editor) Yaakovaryeh (talk) 17:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Yaakovaryeh (talk) 17:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has been the subject of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources including full articles in Bloody Disgusting, The Outline, and Dread Central. Note that Bloody Disgusting and Dread Central are Wikipedia reliable sources for horror topics. There is enough coverage for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC) [reply]
Keep per above; given Local58’s influence on the analog horror sub genre, it would be pretty silly to axe our article on it.--BrayLockBoy (talk) 10:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.