Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Load Impact (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Load Impact

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still no more notable than the last time it was deleted. WP:GNG Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment I have declined a speedy delete, as it is not the same as the previously deleted version. The two new references now here should be considered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Still doesn't seem notable, even with the new refs. Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.