Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Humanx Commonwealth characters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Humanx Commonwealth characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional characters. Fancruft, fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT. No indications of any reliable secondary sources treating these characters. A search reveals none. Any sourceable information that is not only plot summary should be at the series article, Humanx Commonwealth, itself probably a borderline case. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Humanx Commonwealth races. Sandstein 16:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 16:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 16:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like folks are all over the board here. A few more thoughts would be great. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Mostly in-universe plot details, none of which is worth porting over to the main article, which itself is in need of an overhaul per sgeureka. (Also, organizations are not characters.) Clarityfiend (talk) 19:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, utterly fails WP:LISTN, as it contains not a single reference, never mind a reliable secondary one that discusses the characters as a group. The article also fails WP:PLOT, as it contains entirely in-universe information, which also means there is nothing to merge. As none of the listed characters have articles, it serves no navigational purpose. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.