Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liquidsoap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Liquidsoap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not able to establish the notability of this software. No book mentions, no major websites with in-depth coverage, and the research paper about it has been cited exactly zero times according to GScholar (which usually overestimates citation scores). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears there are no papers citing it, no news sources discussing it indepedent of the author, agree w/ nom's comments regarding google scholar. ― Padenton|✉ 07:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Multiple searches found nothing aside from Google Books showing two links (not significant or in-depth). SwisterTwister talk 05:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.