Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lim Ding Wen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are concentrated in 2009, and the same is true after searching on Google.--日期20220626 (talk) 00:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with nominator that the subject is WP:1E. 🌊PacificDepths^talk|contrib 12:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Gnews shows nothing past 2009. I'm not sure this shows continued notability. The person doesn't appear to have continued down the software road to a career, or it hasn't been covered in the media. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

merge with Doodle Kids Czarking0 (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sustained notability, really only had significant coverage for one event. jolielover♥talk 16:08, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. As happy that I am that this young man, who is now 25yo, has supportive parents and that he had the curiosity to start coding early, I'm very surprised that this one has flown under the radar for so long. Same for Doodle Kids to be honest. Turquoise (talk) 18:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This person is only notable for one event which isn't enough to establish significant notability for this article. Galaxybeing (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article subject is only notable for one event that is not significant. The article violates WP:BLP1E. KnowDeath (talk) 07:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]