Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil june aka la punta chow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lil june aka la punta chow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have any references, and seems to fail WP:GNG. States in article that his album sold 3000 copies, I don't think that this is enough to be considered a notable artist. Videomaniac29 (talk) 09:09, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:PROMOTION, WP:AB and WP:MUSICBIO. Very little notability and I've brought in WP:AB as it seems to me like based on the username of the article's creator, they created it about themselves. Can't see much notability online, fails the MUSICBIO guidelines. Adrianw9 (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've searched various databases using various search terms but haven't been able to find any sources that would help to support WP:N notability for this artist. Delete for now, unless/until some third-party sources turn up. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:28, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.