Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libamc
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Libamc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing to indicate this is notable, clearly created with a clear COI and no references Jac16888 Talk 17:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Not only no references, I can't find anything at all about it outside of WP. (I actually found 2 SPA's - one named, one IP - possibly the same corporeal body.) LaMona (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.