Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesser Known Agile Estimation Techniques

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 13:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lesser Known Agile Estimation Techniques

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia articles are not for lesser known topics. Referenced by other wikipedia articles and single white paper. Feels slightly spammy. RadioFan (talk) 01:06, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete . Taken together with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agile Estimation Based on Size and User:Syphron/sandbox, looks like a hit-and-run school project, rather than spam, to me. Can some admean please look into article history of Agile Estimation Based on Size who created it? Staszek Lem (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The title says it all. The article is a non-notable collection of lesser known estimation techniques, held together with some original research. I'm sure the author had the best of intentions, but unfortunately it does not meet our minimum notability standards.- Mr X 01:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Agree with RadioFan. Definitely spammy. SW3 5DL (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. and above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.