Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Das

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Das

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not Notable enough for its own article. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Tamil Nadu. Skynxnex (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - will set a terrible precedent for one-film character articles. Not notable. Neutral Fan (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His backstory is not revealed yet that's why he seems like a one film character. 2600:1700:78E2:9010:7131:909A:C27:2A39 (talk) 03:58, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a great prospect when only one of the cited sources seemed to have any coverage of the character, as "Leo" was mostly used to refer to the film as a whole instead of the specific character. While the character is mentioned in sources that discussed the plot of the film, that does not seem to make the subject notable considering how many articles about characters that have received the same type of coverage were not kept in the end. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not need as a character . Monhiroe (talk) 20:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All this is available at Leo. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no separate notability from the fiction, where it is already covered in a more proportional way. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough to create a separate character article. Pinakpani (talk) 07:53, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.