Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal.io
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Legal.io (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Complete failure of WP:NCORP Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Websites, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Did not find any independent coverage and also $11.6M Series A in 2022 is not significant compared to companies usually considered notable on Wikipedia article. बिनोद थारू (talk) 17:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject does not have the coverage needed to meet the WP:NCORP. Let'srun (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:NCORP. Coverage is poor. Notability is not established. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It exists - but is a niche product in a large market. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.