Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning the hard way (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Learning the hard way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. This is a dictionary entry, not an encyclopedia article. I would propose to move it to Wiktionary, but they already have an entry. Kaldari (talk) 03:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Kaldari (talk) 03:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Or redirect to English-language idioms. Michepman (talk)
- Delete - Per nom, Wiktionary has an entry and that is the appropriate wiki project for definitions of words, idioms and phrases. Per WP:NOTDIC, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This does not meet WP:WORDISSUBJECT. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 08:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - As stated above, this is a common saying that's ideally described on a page somewhere else. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.