Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leanplum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leanplum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficent references for notability of this company, although it may at first look otherwise. Every one of them is essentially a press release, a uncritical report of an interview where the company presidents tells what he wants to. Thats giving them a place to advertise, not writing a news story, and even the WSJ does it. No source is completely reliable for notability -- it is necessary to look at the actual article. The basic policies are NOT INDISCRIMINATE and NOT DIRECTORY--if the WSJ is going to give a story to everyone who receives $5 million in funding, they're indiscriminate. WP:GNG is a guideline. WP:NOT is policy. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best as my searches found some links at News, browsers and Highbeam but nothing outstanding enough to suggests a better notable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 23:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per DGG and fails WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per DGG and fails WP:SIGCOV. - tucoxn\^talk 15:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.