Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laughing Pizza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sandstein 09:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laughing Pizza

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article. Though the band appears to be somewhat notable, according to a quick online search. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fail to meet WP:NMUSIC and WP:BAND criteria. No sources provided in the article. Sources available online fail WP:RS / WP:IS and does not support content available in the article, i.e., Their music videos were seen every day in over 18 million homes on PBS stations and TV On-Demand. QEnigma talk 14:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the band Laughing Pizza meets WP:GNG and is fixable. Started adding sources (Billboard, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Wall Street Journal) and removing unverified promotional claims. It will still take a while since there are so many sources in ProQuest alone (expecting to find more via Newspapers.com, Gale, EBSCOhost)...and also because there are so many unsourced claims that need to be vetted. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The Atlanta Constitution article now used for sourcing is fine, this in a magazine [1]. I'm assuming the Billboard article is also directly about the band. Oaktree b (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article, Citation and news verified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hendrea44 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC) WP:STRIKESOCK CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY, sources provided by Cielquiparle are more than enough to show a WP:GNG pass. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 23:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been considerably improved since nomiination including the addition of a number of references from reliable sources that together show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.