Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lansing Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. whether or not to move/merge is editorial, tehere is no consensus to delete here. TravellingCari 00:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lansing Family

Fails any notability, it has not real world information, it's just a list of members of a fictional family. Orphan as well. Prod was rejected by anonymous IP account. Magioladitis (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Magioladitis (talk) 17:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 22:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For whoever closes this, I moved the page to Lansing family as I don't see a need for "familiy" to be capitalized.--Rockfang (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect both versions to List of General Hospital characters#L.B.Wind (talk) 04:31, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article doesn't contain any information than just some names of fictional characters and fails notability as well. -- nips (talk) 23:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this is an excellent way to organize the characters from notable fictions. Organizational questions like this are not questions for afd--they'rejust questions of how to write up the material. I'd suggest taking the opportunity of having this, to merge in some of the characters. And then do likewqise more generally. DGG (talk) 03:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete: Wikipedia tries to be an encyclopaedia, not a TV magazine, and I see not even 1 encyclopaedic sentence in the whole "article". Could you imagine it in Britannica? I'd also just leave a redirect to List of General Hospital characters#L.--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 06:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - General hospital is a huge, notable subject. While the above talks about the need to be an encyclopaedia, let's not forget that The Soap Opera Encyclopedia is also an encyclopaedia; we strive to be the best encyclopaedia we can be, not merely a fairly useless general purpose encyclopaedia. Wily D 12:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see what's in here that's not already in List_of_General_Hospital_characters. This article is just a short sublist. VG ☎ 13:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep per DGG and and Wily. JoshuaZ (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm all for fiction on Wikipedia, but there's so little context to be had here. Wizardman 19:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.