Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Renaissance en Question
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- La Renaissance en Question (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Du Règne de la Pègre au reveil du Lion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Two more articles about books by Lina Murr Nehme with no indication of meeting WP:Notability (books). Worldcat shows a single library holding of La Renaissance en Question, and has no entry for Du Règne de la Pègre au reveil du Lion. This looks increasingly like a spamming campaign: see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les otages libanais dans les prisons syriennes, jusqu'à quand? and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara de Baalbek. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG. AstroCog (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:44, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing in the article or found elsewhere to indicate that this meets WP:NBOOK criteria. It (and the 2nd volume) are already covered on the page about their author. AllyD (talk) 17:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.