Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUSerNet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LUSerNet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted at AfD in 2005, recreated in 2006 but still lacking sources to demonstrate notability. Mccapra (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 22:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per previous AfD. Not notable. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and previous discussion. This is not notable software. Hog Farm (talk) 01:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article describing a piece of software, its deployment and the reaction of the sys admin within an institution, without evidence of notability. No reason to overturn the November 2005 AfD consensus. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per above, No sign of notability Alex-h (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.