Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LINA (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 08:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LINA (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All that I managed to find was a page of unreliable sources in this search. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I admit today this might seem a somewhat obscure part in the history of portable applications, but I remember this gained some notoriety in the Linux world a few years ago, and we do have some coverage: Computerworld.com [1], computerworld.com.au [2] [3] techworld.com [4] downloadsquad.com [5] Softpedia [6] electronista [7] linux-mag.com [8] lwn.net [9] and a few other Linux-related websites [10] [11] [12]. We also have this press release at reuters.com [13]. LINA also seems to have been featured at O'Reilly's OSCON [14] [15] This was a somewhat ground-breaking technology, but never really reached a high-level of popularity due to lack of "maturity"/development. --SF007 (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Per coverage in Computer World and Tech World (links above). Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.