Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under A11. Lack of any third-party sources and no credible claim of significance leads me to believe this was indeed made up in one day, as mentioned in the AfD. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LG Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i fail to see how this is a notable record company or general company under either name (including "LG Rblx" which has even less sourcing.) I can't find a single rs discussing this - including the pitchfork source already here which makes no mention whatsoever of LG rblx or LG records. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 21:56, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searched and couldn't find any notable sources. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 22:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Multiple Instagram references; apparently fails wp:GNG. Nythar^T^.^C 08:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. Zero reliable sources. As an note, I have blocked the article's creator, Notsammyray, for edit warring (and ostensibly WP:OWN issues). --Kinu ^t/_c 21:18, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So, I did some more in depth digging thanks to the edit warring SPA who created this and it turns out that both LG Records and LG Rblx are completely made up fan crap...PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Given the above and my own investigation, this probably could be deleted per WP:CSD#A11. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, whatever gets rid of it faster. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged it as such but will defer to another set of eyes as I've !voted above. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.