Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kupiansk Offensive
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted under CSD G7. Giraffer (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kupiansk Offensive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"At first, this page was made for Draft:Kupiansk Offensive, which is currently being worked on by someone I know. Creating this page before the draft was finished caused a problem: when the draft is done and ready to be moved, it can't be moved because it clashes with this half-hearted page Bukansatya (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Bukansatya (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Russia, and Ukraine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support speedy delete per the above reasons. There is already a draft at Draft:Kupiansk Offensive being worked on and nearly ready for publishing. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- You told me to respond so uh, yeah the other one needs to be deleted. I didn't see the other draft, sorry. Bcom123 (talk) 03:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- All good mate, mistakes happen. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 03:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Since @Bcom123, the articles creator and sole editor (minus the deletion discussion tag being added), has responded in favour of this articles deletion and admitted it’s creation was unintentional, Wikipedia:G7 for speedy deletion is now applicable, meaning this discussion should close as early as possible with a speedy deletion. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 04:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- I already talked to one of the mods, and they said that to meet the G7 criteria, the Page Creator @Bcom123 needs to add the {{Db-g7}} template to the main page themselves. Bukansatya (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- In the interest of clarity: I am neither a "mod" (there are no "moderators" on Wikipedia) nor an administrator (our closest equivalent to the concept); I can give advice on what (if any) speedy tag to use but cannot act on any such nomination. (I think I only got roped into this due to my deletion sorting, and have no opinion or comment that has not already been said in some form.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry if I accidentally dragged you into this Bukansatya (talk) 07:10, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- How do I add the template? I don't want to mess anything up. 2600:4040:5014:7F00:D495:183E:523D:B7F8 (talk) 01:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming you’re @Bcom123, you need to first log into your account, edit the main page Kupiansk Offensive, and at the top of the page, above everything else, type Db-g7 in between these double brackets {{}} as seen in Bukansatya’s reply and publish the edit. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- ok Bcom123 (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for talking to that moderator, I think it worked. Bcom123 (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- Assuming you’re @Bcom123, you need to first log into your account, edit the main page Kupiansk Offensive, and at the top of the page, above everything else, type Db-g7 in between these double brackets {{}} as seen in Bukansatya’s reply and publish the edit. IiSmxyzXX (talk) 08:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- In the interest of clarity: I am neither a "mod" (there are no "moderators" on Wikipedia) nor an administrator (our closest equivalent to the concept); I can give advice on what (if any) speedy tag to use but cannot act on any such nomination. (I think I only got roped into this due to my deletion sorting, and have no opinion or comment that has not already been said in some form.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- I already talked to one of the mods, and they said that to meet the G7 criteria, the Page Creator @Bcom123 needs to add the {{Db-g7}} template to the main page themselves. Bukansatya (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- You told me to respond so uh, yeah the other one needs to be deleted. I didn't see the other draft, sorry. Bcom123 (talk) 03:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - unsourced fork. Bearian (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've deleted the page under G7 since it was tagged as such but for the record, a page already existing at the target location of a draft is not usually a reason to AfD. That said, if the creator of the mainspace page doesn't object, I suppose it's fine. Giraffer (talk) 16:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.