Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kommandcore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kommandcore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Software product is discontinued, the company website is no more, the software was probably always non-notable anyway (Google books has a few references in general lists) and the article is written in a typical spammy advertising style U2fanboi (talk) 08:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 20:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 02:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above - No evidence of notability –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:55, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only ever seems to have attracted minimal start-up coverage; no evidence found of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, don't know anyone that would use this nowadays. RWCasinoKid (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, A larger number of ghits than I expected, but I'm not finding anything in the way of substantial coverage in WP:RS that could justify an article. Does not meet WP:NSOFT. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.