Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kill System
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kill System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While it has three somewhat notable members, it fails WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
What about the many associated acts? I believe, that I can find another reference somewhere (That's not in Spanish, cause that's all could find). --Metalworker14 (Yo) 13:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- They're interesting but do not confer notability. Can any RSes be found to support it? Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but someone found a reference and put them on List of Christian metal artists.--Metalworker14 (Yo) 22:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Simply not notable as my searches found nothing good with this being the best result. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: This article does have some merits per BAND, while their is no sources, where it makes this article a major problem with regards to GNG, meaning it should go away.The Cross Bearer (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.