Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KidsClick Schedule Changes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:49, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KidsClick Schedule Changes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by creator. We are WP:NOTVGUIDE nor are we a collection of indiscriminate information. !dave 08:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Non-encyclopedic and a typical exemplifier of what is NOT Wikipedia. Lourdes 10:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Proposed deletion should not have been challenged. This is clearly NOT as Lourdes points out and specifically WP:NOTTVGUIDE: "Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, ..." Spshu (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with article Kids Click. It is not really possible to understand this article out of context. Vorbee (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vorbee: It's worth noting the lack of encyclopedic content to add, as noted above, and in policy, we aren't a TV guide, and we don't list when things are gonna be on. !dave 17:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not entirely sure if this actually meets the criteria for speedy deletion… but as with virtually everyone else in this discussion, I cannot see how we can have this article when we are not a program guide. While NOTTVGUIDE does say historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable, I don't really think this really qualifies as "historically significant". Take away the airtimes (which, even when not within the context of an actual schedule, have in other articles been deemed to violate NOTTVGUIDE) and you just have a list of programs aired on the block… which is already in the main KidsClick article and does not need its own page. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Ajf773 (talk) 19:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Oh hell no, WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Definitely a reaction to KidsClick editors trying to keep that article from becoming an unfiltered WP:ADVERT. Also a WP:TROUT to Philblue7 (talk · contribs) who still hasn't gotten the point of why we keep this cruft out of articles (my warning to them from November 3rd, for instance). In addition it's all unsourced, and as I have re-iterated to the user several times, stations can air the programming whenever they want, so the times are not universal. Nate • (chatter) 21:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete totally non-encyclopedic and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete clear-cut case of WP:NOT. Lepricavark (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.