Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyssa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 18:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keyssa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized article about a company, not properly referenced as passing our inclusion criteria for companies. As always, companies are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH on their sourceability -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, with very little evidence of any GNG-building coverage about it in reliable sources. Bearcat (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all I see are PR links, there's one Reuters story about an Apple exec joining the company. Nothing beyond that for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your feedback. I have removed the PR sources. Kmr719 (talk) 01:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It is odd that this has become an article more than a year after the company's assets were transferred to Molex, to which Keyssa's former website also transfers, but that could perhaps be a WP:ATD target? There is also some information about a legal case at Essential Phone but that does not seem notable in itself. AllyD (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nature of the semiconductor industry is consolidation of important technologies into larger companies - there are very few small companies left, but the importance of the acquired companies lives on as these companies have built the technology base of the large semiconductor companies that remain todayhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_consolidation Kmr719 (talk) 01:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for comment, more notable sources will be proposed shortly Kmr719 (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.