Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KeyMe
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator has withdrawn. All contributors to the discussion favour keeping. (non-admin closure) Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- KeyMe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 15:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:NCORP. In addition to some WP:RS in the article,[1][2][3] there has been some more recent coverage.[4][5] SailingInABathTub (talk) 19:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ Barzilay, Omri. "How KeyMe Is Taking Over The $7.5B Locksmith Industry". Forbes Magazine.
- ^ "Startup KeyMe offers cheaper alternative to replacing car keys". New York Post. 21 December 2014.
- ^ Aamoth, Doug. "Locked Out? This App Stores Your Keys Online". Time Magazine.
- ^ Brian X. Chen (March 6, 2019). "This Tech Makes D.I.Y. Key Duplication Easy. Maybe Too Easy". New York Times.
- ^ Marc Weber Tobias (Jun 20, 2018). "The High-Tech Way To Get Copies Of Your Keys, But Is It Smarter?". Forbes.
- @SailingInABathTub: Could you update the article with these and I will close this. Please don't put the Forbes references, they are contributors and are non-rs. The rest are decent. It is an interesting company and an interesting proposition, taken to its logical conclusion, means that every door on the planet can be hacked. Cool though. scope_creepTalk 13:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- No problem, I've added the NYT reference. SailingInABathTub (talk) 15:36, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Nomination Withdrawn. There is coverage. scope_creepTalk 15:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.