Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kermet Apio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kermet Apio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think winning "The Great American Comedy Festival", important as it may sound, a local comedy show, does not confer notability. All of the references provided on the page are self-published. Cloudz 679 11:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are quite a few hits in gNews, but having gone through quite a few of them, they seem to be mostly listings information, with a few fleshed out with press release and interview material. Not quite enough to pass WP:GNG, and certainly nothing to pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article is not written in the best Wikipedia style, and needs independent sourcing, but I think the GNews results include sufficient coverage in multiple sources to meet WP:GNG; the coverage is from all over the country, and includes detailed articles such as [1], as well as others behind pay walls. As for the Great American Comedy Festival, it may not have a Wikipedia article yet and it's located in Norfolk, Nebraska, but it has quite a bit of coverage[2] including not just Nebraska papers but also The Hollywood Reporter[3] and The New York Times[4]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 05:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.