Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-377c

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of exoplanets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft. czar 02:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-377c (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NASTRO, not notable. One of 715 new Kepler planets in one particular batch. Nothing else of merit that I can see. I couldn't find any publications of coverage specific to this object. Lithopsian (talk) 21:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How about redirecting it to an article about the 715 new Kepler planets? Terrariola (talk) 09:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is List of exoplanets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft. It includes a link to Kepler-377c which is a bit incestuous, but actually contains more information than the article including the correct year of discovery. Lithopsian (talk) 11:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According to this source, the year of discovery was 2014. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since it has more information, let's redirect Kepler-377c to List of planets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft. SpaceDude777 (talk) March 19, 2017, 7:28 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 19:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to "List of exoplanets discovered using the Kepler spacecraft". All of the information is already in that list, and the stub is unlikely to be expanded. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.