Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kepler-23d

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Kepler-23. History is thereunder for a merge, if desired Star Mississippi 23:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-23d

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Kepler-23 as per WP:DWMP. Subject fails to meet notability for astronomical objects. Did WP:BEFORE and Kepler-23d is not the subject of significant scholarship at this time. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Restore original redirect to Kepler-23 per nom. SevenSpheres (talk) 01:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What's the standard for notability for astronomical objects?

Jothefiredragon (talk) 04:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jothefiredragon here you go WP:NASTRO and WP:DWMP. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kepler-23, which is in need of more content. Praemonitus (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mergeto Kepler-23. Fewer but larger articles are more maintainable. Please note: this discussion should also apply to Kepler-23b and Kepler-23c as well as Kepler-23d. They all somehow got their own articles 67.198.37.16 (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.