Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Mathison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. Not sure what went wrong with my search, perhaps a typo in the name? Clearly was wrong on this nom. Apologies/thanks for improvement. Star Mississippi 17:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Mathison

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find reviews of his books, nor indications he's well cited enough to pass author or academic notability. Star Mississippi 14:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Religion. Star Mississippi 14:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Google Scholar citations of 95 and 74 for his major works are quite high for the field. That would be the way to demonstrate notability - under WP:PROF #1. I'll see what I can add to the article.St Anselm (talk) 15:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per citation index explanation above. Oaktree b (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF #1. His phrase "solo Scriptura" has become very important to Protestant-Catholic discussions, as evidenced by the citations in the article. St Anselm (talk) 16:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.