Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Britton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Britton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is not notable, other than the fact he is engaged to Zoe Saldana.. See Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Invalid_criteria Betito84 (talk) 22:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC) — Betito84 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

delete. not notable outside of the company he keeps. Cindamuse (talk) 23:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. -- role^player 20:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Zoe Saldana#Personal life where he has a sourced mention. Per available sources, his relationship... his being part of Saldana's personal life... is why he gets any coverage at all. While as an actor and as CEO of "My Fashion Database",[1][2] he has done something in life other than date Zoe Saldana... it would seem all that the popular media care about is that one relationship. And a 10-year relation, even one that continues to make the news, is still only ONE relationship... making his coverage a WP:BLP1-very-long-E which does not merit an independent article. BUT as his name is a reasonable search term, a redirect will take readers to the one place where his has his one-event coverage. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no notability at all. His article is all of one line. Philname1 (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With respects, while not meriting an individual article, a redirect of a reasonable search term to the one place where he does have sourced mention in context to his coverage is sensible. And please note... I do not suggest a merge, as the redirect target already covers him sufficiently. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.