Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate branch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kate branch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created as a result of this paid editing bid on elance.com in violation of our policy that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion. The subject appears to be nonnotable (being a Playboy model is not in itself an indicator of notability) as she hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Them From Space 12:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nomination. --Korruski (talk) 14:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nomination. --Kudpung (talk) 17:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question (to somebody who's a member of Elance and can read the content): How much did she pay? -- Hoary (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A grand total of..... $50. Them From Space 23:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fifty dollars to go from her "about" page to this article? Ha ha. (Mmm, but what does WP:HOTTIE say?) -- Hoary (talk) 23:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, guys i am new here. She has also represented Australia in beauty pageants, we are still researching on that and would add it with references today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amratsaeed (talk • contribs) 05:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, and anyway she fails to meet the notability guidelines for pornographic models. NZ forever (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable Dreamspy (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only participating in a beauty contest with questionable notability doesn't really qualify. Article doesn't meet the guidelines WP:ANYBIO and WP:NMODEL. Minima c (talk) 05:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, per user:Minimac above, per user:NZ forever above. Keristrasza (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nomination. - Hydroxonium (talk) 00:19, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.