Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Waheed Avocats
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Karl Waheed Avocats (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable law firm. No indications within the article, or based on searches, that this firm merits inclusion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:V failed due to lack of references making it difficult to establish notability. From what I gather, there is no real claim to notability and the article fails WP:CORP and the WP:GNG. N4 (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.