Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalaroad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I'm going to speedy all these nominations. Nominator clearly hasn't done WP:BEFORE and these are only going to go one way. No point in wasting anybody elses time. SpinningSpark 18:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kalaroad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article haven't any reliable sources and infobox to show it's context. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 14:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep First of all, infobox is not necessary. An article may or may not have it. Secondly, it passes WP:GEOLAND as it says,
"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable."
Knightrises10 (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2018 (UTC) - Speedy Keep as above it clearly passes WP:GEOLAND. Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.