Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kagapujandar

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 November 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kagapujandar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third party sources found to support notability Redtigerxyz ^Talk 07:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 18:53, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've provided third party reference links in that above mentioned article. Also editing the article from the reliable sources. Give me time to improve the article. Also remove the article from 'Articles of Deletion' page. Thank you. Arulraja (talk) 08:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

Hi. A lot of the sources you are using are not reliable They are blogs, in which anyone can write anything at all. I could write a blog entry claiming Kagapujandar is a rare feathered Pokemon, and (if we didn't have rules against blogs) rewrite your article to include this fake fact. I'm not saying your blog references are lying like mine would. But they easily could. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, given enough references from books and websites.Arulraja (talk) 05:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

Delete I've tagged this as a possible copyright violation as it seems to be a direct copy of material from the only website listed in the article.TheRingess (talk) 19:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,if you see the history of the page you can see I am still editing and now the page is totally different from the external link. Earlier while created the page it was a copy of that link but now it has a different content than the website. Apart two or three sentences looks the same and I can change as I am still improving the article. Arulraja (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

Recreated the page with further modifications in Talk:Kagapujandar/Temp. Arulraja (talk) 05:42, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja (talk) 04:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Arulraja[reply]

Delete - The title of the article probably should be Sri Kagapujandar Dharmalinga Swamigal, rather than Kagapujandar, Sri Kagapujandar, Kagabujandar, or Sri Kagabujandar. In any event, I only found two WP:RSs and those only mention his name.August 22, 2003, May 21, 2007. That is not enough reliable source material from which to draw and build a Wikipedia article per WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.