Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KXPD-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KXPD-LP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; some references are dead links. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Oregon. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It looks like the sources are reliable and qualify for WP:GNG. Plus, the dead links can be fixed easily.

Also, like what Danubeball mentioned, the sources are from legitimate newspapers. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 04:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I’d argue that the article’s still worth keeping, as these seem to be from legitimate newspapers, they just so happened to die. --Danubeball (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sources 3, 4, and 5 in the article seem to be independent RS covering the station. I'd say the WP:GNG is being met here, dead links can be fixed. Let'srun (talk) 01:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.