Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jwalantham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is really "Delete for now, and userfy" but I don't see any obvious volunteers to work on this. If anybody would like to take on incubating and improving this, please drop me a note on my talk page and I'll be happy to restore it into your user space. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jwalantham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the references that appear in this article are links to WP:ROUTINE movie websites that list the cast and summarize the plot. None of them are to places where the movie is critically discussed. As it stands, the article does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG, and would require multiple reliable independent and non-trivial/ routine sources (preferably placed inline rather than listed at the bottom) in order to be retained. KDS4444^Talk 14:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

found through WP:INDAFD: title:Jwalantham, director:"Ambarish B M", actors Jwala, "Deepti Kapse", "Deepa Gowda", producers: "Anu Rao", "V. Kumar", & "Rajesh Raikar"

TOO SOON. So temporary delete or userfy. While the project is slated for release in December, and is beginning to get coverage, it does not have quite enough coverage "yet" to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3). This will be welcome in a few months, and until then might be mentioned and sourced in related articles, it is currently simply TOO SOON for an article. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy, if creator or editor(s) wish to embark on further Quality improvement. — Cirt (talk) 09:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.