Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bilyeu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. $Salvio giuliano$ 18:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Bilyeu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources that are independent about him appear to just be routine transfer announcements and do not meet WP:SIGCOV, therefore Bilyeu appears to not meet WP:GNG. Possible redirect to All-time New York Red Bulls roster. Raskuly (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Arizona, Illinois, Missouri, New York, and Texas. Raskuly (talk) 09:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG [1][2][3] ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 18:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Keep per sources found by ~WikiOriginal-9~ Demt1298 (talk) 00:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This one also is a detailed one for WP:SIGCOV.Cruzdoze (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Spot checks on the existing citations does seem to match noms findings lacking SIGCOV,
Ping@~WikiOriginal-9~ can you help me understand better why the three new citations you found is SIGCOV? I have started to read thru them and 2nd one seems to refer more to the subjects brother though.Lorraine Crane (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't notice that second article was actually about someone else. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per sources provided by WikiOriginal-9 and one provided by Cruzdoze which prove notability. Servite et contribuere (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.