Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JustOrbit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JustOrbit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost exclusively sourced to PR sites. The article itself reads like a PR piece. Fails NCORP and GNG. M4DU7 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only promotional and trivial coverage -- Ab207 (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional sources, promotional writing. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional, many of the sources look like press releases. Doesn't seem to have sufficient independant coverage, so not notable. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON... -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.