Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jupiter brain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Matrioshka brain. while no consensus for deletion/there is a consensus to have both Jupiter brain and Matrioshka brain. I will merge jupiter brain into the other - if the other way then you can do the changes JForget 23:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter brain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A nonnotable neologism and article full of original reasearch (collection of examples), Wikipedia is not a vehicle of promotion of new ideas. - Altenmann >t 14:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Related to Matrioshka brain. Suggest merging both terms into one page. (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrioshka brain) Viriditas (talk) 16:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As above. It also often used by science fiction authors. --Soyweiser (talk) 15:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The term is used with moderate frequency by futurists, in the cited essay and elsewhere. Whether this meets WP:N in general depends on what one assumes the scope of the audience is. This is an important and nontrivial choice, for this article and others, as choice of scope and guidelines for scope in notability decisions affect large numbers of articles. That said, I'm abstaining from voting, despite being the author of the original stub. Keep, merge, or delete as you see fit (I have my nostalgia-copy on disk). --Christopher Thomas (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The AFD on Matrioshka brain has been closed "keep". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka++ 00:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Matrioshka brain, as it has little sources and content to credit its own article. This term seems only notable from within the field of the Matrioshka brain article. Inclusion in the article and its notability in the field can be discussed in the talk page. If the section in the Matrioshka brain article expands and more sources are found, the article can be recreated.– sampi ^{(talk•contrib•email)} 09:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Matrioshka brain - not enough sources to stand on its own, but appears to be notable enough to be included in a related article.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 18:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. same as above 98.212.163.76 (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC) (Moved below relisting banner; originally a response to User:Viriditas.)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.