Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Allen Heard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 22:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Allen Heard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial awards, the references are the usual PR. DGG ( talk ) 06:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The article is well cited, ~30 citations, with what appear to be independent, reliable sources, however, most of them are from Africa, and I'm personally not qualified to analyze their reliability. Could someone familiar with these publications add their analysis on the refs? One of the refs is a feature on her in BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-46883037 which is significant, but I can't assess the others, for example https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/187552 I am open to changing my vote based on the subsequent discussion. CosmicNotes (talk) 09:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the awards are not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is independent, with reliable sources, however, most of them are from Uganda where she comes from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riderfuture (talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I don’t believe this passes WP:NMODEL. She has won a single modelling award that I don’t think is notable, and been given an ‘honorary’ award which is described as countering the view that she had “nothing to offer other than jumping from one party to another”. There are plenty of sources but they mostly look like gossip mags and other unreliable titles. Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe this passes WP:NMODEL. She is a notable model in her community. There are plenty of sources which describe and certify her as a model with reliable titles from her country Uganda. And also one of the refs is a feature on her in BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-46883037 which is significant and reliable thus concluding with a keep on Wikipedia. Riderfuture (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Duplicate. Daniel (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:57, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe this passes WP:NMODEL. She is a notable model in her community. There are plenty of sources which describe and certify her as a model with reliable titles from her country Uganda. And also one of the refs is a feature on her in BBC News https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-46883037 which is significant and reliable thus concluding with a keep on Wikipedia. Riderfuture (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC) Duplicate. Daniel (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lacks suitable references indicating notability per WP:GNG. Daniel (talk) 00:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, easily meets WP:GNG with international coverage by BBC and CNN, as well as extensive coverage in Uganda

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.