Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Nichols (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Drake & Josh characters. (non-admin closure) Alpha Quadrant talk 19:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Josh Nichols (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is unsourced and the information is covered nicely about the character at List of Drake & Josh characters. In addition, no other major characters have their own pages, and IMHO, none of them should. Tinton5 (talk) 06:04, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of Drake & Josh characters if there is found to be any information not already found there. The first AFD for this article appears to be for a different Josh Nichols, so that info doesn't really apply here. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and/or redirect to List of Drake & Josh characters. Just plot info (WP:NOT#PLOT) and in-universe trivia, nothing sourced. The LoC already has a succinct character desciption, so I see nothing to merge. With this being the only D&J character that currently has a separate bad-shape article, it should be given the same (non-article) status as all the other characters. – sgeureka t•c 08:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Drake & Josh Characters. 11coolguy12 (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect to List of Drake & Josh characters: The fictional character does not seem to meet the general notability guideline. As the fictional character has no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that make analytic or evaluative claims about him from a real-world perspective or beyond the plot of the TV show, any article about him can only be a summary-only description of a fictional work. On top of that, the article is unreferenced, so I do not see a valid reason to keep the article. A redirect to List of Drake & Josh characters may be a good alternative to deletion, but I favor deletion slightly since the fictional character's name is shared by real people not related in any way to the show. Jfgslo (talk) 23:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Does not meet the general notability guideline. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.