Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jora.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jora.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable website. No indication of WP:notability. Only references are to the site itself or a piece on the owning company that merely names it. Google searches provide very few hits and no significant coverage. noq (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lack of reliable sources sustaining notability. FOARP (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of RS coverage to demonstrate meeting either WP:GNG or WP:NWEB. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could find no appropriate coverage at all. Aoziwe (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Speedy candidate. There is nothing out there for reliable sources other than a few brief mentions. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Alexa indicates that this is 217th site in its main market. However, my searches are not finding the WP:RS coverage about the site which which would be needed to demonstrate WP:NWEB / WP:GNG notability. AllyD (talk) 19:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lack of notability. Sdmarathe (talk) 01:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.