Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonxion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jonxion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. I fail to understand why this low-rise suburban office building is notable. MTLskyline (talk) 01:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Web searches on "jonxion" return mostly false positive, so I added "brossard', where it is located. Zero Gnews hits. General Ghits show routine directory listings and sales sites, plus primary links. Maybe if and when it is fully developed and occupied, it will generate notability, but fails WP:GNG now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I was able to add references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A slight improvement, but not especially substantial. Refs sound advertorial. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 06:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The coverage found by Eastmain does look in-depth and they are reliable sources independent of the topic.--Oakshade (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article is about a building with office space for rent. Coverage that establishes little more than that it has opened and that space is available in it cannot turn this into a subject that belongs in an encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a couple of small office buildings, or even a complex of several small-to-mid-sized buildings are not notable. PK T(alk) 12:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Perhaps Jonxion is notable in part because it is a representative of the development of that stretch of Lapinière Boulevard and the "C" sector of Brossard. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I see no significance here, it's just an ordinary building. Is it being used for some unique purpose, or the land it sits on of historical value? I think not. Does not qualify for an article.--Apple2gs (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.