Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JonOne
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 05:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- JonOne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Granted, as a graffiti artist and painter, it's somewhat difficult to establish yourself, there is essentially nothing on "JonOne" that establishes him as a noteworthy individual. I thus nominate this article for deletion on the basis of a lack of notability. Qwerty Binary (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per patent lack of WP:BEFORE. Article already lists some reliable sources, the relevant article on French Wikipedia reveals more, a search on Google News archives shows 199 articles about him such as Le Figaro, 90 bpm, Paris-Art, Libération, Respect Mag, Nord Éclair, Il Nord, Metro, The Standard, Libération again, Daily News & Analysis, Premiere. Cavarrone (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep – This person passes WP:BASIC per the sources above presented by User:Cavarrone. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep as passing WP:BASIC per the sources presented by Cavarrone. Nothing else to note. — ΛΧΣ21™ 01:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.