Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewish Task Force (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Task Force

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that the organization actually exists outside of the website.

Delete; it's been three years since the last AFD, and since then, no sourcing has been added to the article; all the sources are either from the "organization"'s own website, or are articles about the terrorist who runs the "organization" (and make no reference to the "organization" at all.) --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:48, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see how it surivied the last AfD, but if anything, it seems to be bootstrapped to Victor Vancier. I do not see any independent sources that discuss this group, and hence fails WP:N. Angryapathy (talk) 18:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of secondary sources; I couldn't even find it on the Google news link above. Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Why exactly is this article being considered for deletion? Jewish Task Force search on Google receives 390,000 results. There is proof that this organization exists. The article could be sourced a little better but i don't see why it should be deleted. It seems notable enough to deserve its own article. --Werblum54 (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Werblum, could you provide a diff? When I typed in "Jewish Task Force", I got over 802,000 hits[1], all to generic Jewish task forces, not this specific organization. Yoninah (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete. A search of a large news aggregator reveals a few mentions in passing but no significant information. The WP article as it stands is clearly just an advertisement for the organization and its web page. I can only see a see sentences from third-party sources. Zero^talk 11:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.