Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! broadcast history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 12:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! broadcast history

This article contains non-encyclopedic information, random snippets of trivia (including winning scores on premiere episodes) and reads like a book report. Sottolacqua (talk) 14:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Huge trivia dump, any relevant information should already be summarized in the Jeopardy! article. This is not at all like the Pyramid franchise, which doesn't summarize nearly as easily due to its myriad (which is almost an anagram of pyramid) versions. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 16:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Though it needs cleanup, it's really just a split of the show's history from the already lengthy main Jeopardy! article. At the very least merge the section on the original 1964-1975 show into Jeopardy!#Other versions (and perhaps reorganize this into a "History" section), as there appears to be little to no information about the original show in the main article, unlike the various 1970's versions of the show. BryanG (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - At worst, the relevant, sourced content should be merged into the main Jeopardy! article. But given the length of that article, this separate article is appropriate (although, as BryanG says, it ought to be cleaned up, but that is no reason to delete). Rlendog (talk) 02:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Reads very much like a fansite. Hosts, announcers and networks are already listed in the main article's infobox. No need to reference background/history in a separate article as it's already discussed in the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sottolacqua (talk • contribs) 13:22, 1 May 2009

Note to closing admin: this user is the nominator, see [1]. Note to Sottolacqua: it's generally considered bad form to add bolded !votes to an AfD you began, it's implicit that you want the article deleted as the nominator. Additional comments are fine, of course. BryanG (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Sarilox (talk) 04:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and reverse merge (that is, split out) content from the main Jeopardy! article to this one. The Jeopardy! article is alredy tagged as being too long, and there's no reason that a long-running show like Jeopardy! shouldn't have such an article, which is very akin to the "Current TV show season N+1" genre of articles. No reason it shouldn't be cleaned up and/or sourced. Jclemens (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.