Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeet Visual Arts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 03:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeet Visual Arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources. PROD removed by page creator with no statement. —swpbT 15:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 15:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 15:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —swpbT 15:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that Shawn. I first heard of this editor in December last when he tried to put his village Bahanaga on the map. The article was very poor, so I rewrote it, added pushpin, coordinates, refs, and I even managed to identify the local language, (Oriya), so I could add the translation in the infobox. I detest advertizing on Wikipedia, but I'm happy to assist a newb, with little command of English, when his purpose is only to get his small corner of the planet identified on wikipedia. I had only been addressing the article for 1 hour 20 minutes when you posted, so patience - please. MarkDask 19:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have tried to find sufficiently noteworthy secondary sources but they simply don't exist, so yes, delete. MarkDask 12:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.