Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JaxEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 02:17, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JaxEdit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete, appears to be non notable software/programming. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete unsourced online editor - just another web site. noq (talk) 15:10, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JayJay^{What did I do?} 01:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No coverage in independent reliable sources found; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT at this time. Gong show 02:23, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find reliable, secondary sources about the topic. Fails general notability guideline. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per above, also, created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject does not meet notability criteria. Have placed welcome note on talk page to give help, as creator's account has been dormant 2 years.—Baldy Bill (talk) 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.