Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Huff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Huff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, originally about an artist and gallery employee with one minor media notice, is now an amalgam of information about 3 or 4 different Jason Huffs presented as if it were about a single person. None of them are notable. ShelfSkewed Talk 19:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: I meant to point out that both versions were created by the same editor.--ShelfSkewed Talk 19:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:Don't build the Frankenstein. This is a classic case. See TALK:Frederick Meyer for a more subtle example. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is poorly written, with some extracts cut and paste from copyrighted sources in which I had to remove immediately. Other than that, I can't find evidence of notability. Minima © (talk) 06:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per above. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.